Investigating the presence of misconceptions of 8th grade students through multiple-choice questions at national chemistry competition test
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2017.1257Keywords:
conceptual understanding, lower-secondary education, misconceptions, multiple-choice questions, National chemistry competition.Abstract
A study was conducted to test the level of conceptual understanding of certain chemistry concepts defined in the national curriculum in Macedonia among 8th grade students who participated in the National chemistry competition in the 2016/17 school year. The students were tested on the following topics: state of matter, metals and non-metals, elementary substances, compounds and mixtures, chemical reactions and introduction to organic chemistry. An analysis of the multiple-choice questions was performed in order to categorize students’ achievements in four areas of conceptual understanding (satisfactory conceptual understanding, roughly adequate performance, inadequate performance, and quite inadequate performance) according to the percentage of students who correctly answered the test items. Furthermore, the findings revealed three misconceptions and several vague and erroneous notions present in students’ minds.
References
. S. Taber, Chemical Misconceptions – Prevention, Diagnosis and Cure; Part 1 – Theoretical Background, Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2002.
A. H. Johnstone, Teaching of chemistry – Logical or psycho-logical?, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 1, 9–15 (2000).
D. L. Gabel, R. D. Sherwood, L. Enochs, Problem-solving skills of high school chemistry, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 21, 221–233 (1984).
DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660210212
O. Akınoğlu, R. Ö. Tandoğan, The Effects of Problem-Based Active Learning in Science Education on Students’ Academic Achievement, Attitude and Concept Learning, Eurasia J. Math. Sci. & Tech. Ed., 3 (1), 71–81 (2007).
L. S. Kogut, Critical thinking in general chemistry, J. Chem. Educ., 73 (3), 218–221 (1996).
DOI: 10.1021/ed073p218
C. Jacob, Critical thinking in the chemistry classroom and beyond, J. Chem. Educ., 81 (8), 1216–1223 (2004). DOI: 10.1021/ed081p1216
D. Trivić, O. Finlayson, J. Lovatt, L. McCormack, De-sign of Learning and Assessment Tasks. In: A Guidebook of Good Practice for the Pre-Service Training of Chemistry Teachers, I. Maciejowska, B. Byers (Eds), Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, 2015, pp. 125–148.
H. D. Barke, A. Hazari, S. Yitbarek, Students’ misconceptions and how to overcome them. In: Miscon-ceptions in Chemistry. Addressing Perceptions in Chemi-cal Education, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009, pp. 21–36.
N. Canpolat, Turkish undergraduates’ misconceptions of evaporation, evaporation rate, and vapour pressure. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 28, 1757–1770 (2006).
A. Pabuçcu, Ö. Geban, Remediating misconceptions concerning chemical bonding through conceptual change text, Hacet. Unit. Egit. Fak., 30, 184–192 (2006).
I. Mijić, Testing conceptual knowledge in chemistry among students of secondary gymnasium schools, MSc thesis, Faculty of Natural Science and Mathematics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, 2017.
H. S. Dhindsa, D. S. Treagust, Conceptual under¬standing of Bruneian tertiary students: Chemical bonding and structure, Brunei Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., 1, 33–51 (2009).
I. I. Salame, S. Sarowar, S. Begum, D. Krauss, Students’ alternative conceptions about atomic properties and the periodic table, Chem. Educator, 16, 190–194 (2011). DOI: 10.1333/s00897112375a
S. Markić, P. E. Childs, Planning a good chemistry les-son. In: A Guidebook of Good Practice for the Pre-Service Training of Chemistry Teachers, I. Maciejowska, B. Byers (Eds), Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, 2015, pp. 67–84.
S. Gulati, D. Pant, Education for Values in Schools – A Framework, http://www.ncert.nic.in/departments/nie/ depfe/Final.pdf, accessed July 2017.
Tom Verhoeff, The Role of Competitions in Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing Science, Netherlands, http://olympiads.win.tue.nl/ioi/ioi97/ffut-wrld/competit.pdf, accessed July 2017.
The Bureau for the Development of Education, http://www.bro.gov.mk/docs/nastavni-programi/Cambridge /VII-IX/Nastavna%20programa-Hemija-VIII%20odd% 20devetgodisno.pdf, accessed July 2017.
D. Forbes, R. Fosbery, A. Fullick, V. Newman, R. Nor-ris, L. Ryan, Essential Science for Cambridge Secondary 1 Stage 8 Pupils Book (Chemistry), Ars Lamina, Skopje, 2016 (translation into Macedonian).
J. K. Gilbert, The study of student misunderstandings in the physical sciences. Res. Sci. Educ., 7 (1), 165–171 (1977).
A. S. Awan, T. M. Khan, M. N. Mohsin, A. H. Doger, Students’ misconceptions in learning basic concept ‘composition of matter’ in chemistry. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 1 (4), 161–167 (2011).
F. C. Cañada, D. G. Gómez, D. A. Rodríguez, L. V. M. Niño, M. A. D. Acedo, Change in elementary school students’ misconceptions on material systems after a theoretical-practical instruction, Int. Elec. J. Elem. Educ., 9 (3), 499–510 (2017).
M. J. Sanger, Using particulate drawings to determine and improve students’ conceptions of pure substances and mixtures, J. Chem. Educ.,77 (6), 762–766 (2000).
C. Liolta, Organic nomenclature, I, J. Chem. Educ., 47 (6), 471–472 (1970).
O. K. Oke, G. M. Alam, Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of 2 and 3D visualizations in students’ understanding of structures of organic molecules, Int. J. Phys. Sci., 5 (5), 605–611 (2010).
J. Orvis, D. Sturges, S. Rhodes, K. White, T. W. Maurer, S. M. Landge, A Mailman analogy: Retaining student learning gains in alkane nomenclature, J. Chem. Educ.,93, 879−885 (2016).
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00551
Chemistry competition for lower-secondary school stu-dents, Society of Chemists and Technologists of Macedonia, http://sctm.mk/natprevari-osnovno-2017-mk.htm, accessed July 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors agree to the following licence: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.