Multi-class analysis of antimicrobial substances in poultry feed at cross-contamination levels by UHPLC-MS/MS – Method establishment, validation, and application

UHPLC-MS/MS analysis of antimicrobials in feed

Authors

  • Elizabeta Dimitrieska Stojkovikj Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Skopje, Lazar Pop Trajkov 5-7, 1001 Skopje, North Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8315-5267
  • Dushica Koceva Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Skopje, Lazar Pop Trajkov 5-7, 1001 Skopje, North Macedonia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5777-9593
  • Aleksandra Angjeleska Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Skopje, Lazar Pop Trajkov 5-7, 1001 Skopje, North Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-2681
  • Goran Stojković Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Institute of Chemistry, Arhimedova 5, 1001 Skopje, North Macedonia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9207-0985
  • Biljana Stojanovska Dimzoska Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Skopje, Lazar Pop Trajkov 5-7, 1001 Skopje, North Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1688-6179
  • Zehra Hajrulai-Musliu Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - Skopje, Lazar Pop Trajkov 5-7, 1001 Skopje, North Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-9022

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2025.3166

Keywords:

Antimicrobial substances, poultry feed, multi-class UHPLC-MS/MS method, matrix effect, stability study.

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1229 establishes maximum limits (MLs) for the cross-contamination of antimicrobial substances in feed intended for food-producing animals. This study presents the development and in-house validation of two multi-class analytical methods for detecting antimicrobial substances in poultry feed at cross-contamination levels, using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Methods with and without solid-phase extraction (SPE) purification were developed for 26 antimicrobial substances across eight classes, covering a concentration range of 5–300 µg kg–1. The established methods were validated for parameters including selectivity, limit of quantification, within- and between-day precision, accuracy, decision limit, matrix effect, and short-term analyte stability in the corresponding extracts. Both methods met the required performance criteria for detecting antimicrobial substances at cross-contamination levels, except for reduced sensitivity to lincomycin in the SPE method. The between-day precision was below 18 % and 19 %, with recoveries ranging from 95 to 103 %, for the method without SPE, and from 88 % to 101 % for the method with SPE, respectively. The analytes remained stable after two days of storage in the dark under two temperature regimes. These methods were applied to 39 poultry feed samples, revealing that approximately 41 % contained one or more antimicrobial substances, some of which exceeded the cross-contamination MLs. This study underscores the importance of simple, rapid, sensitive, and reliable analytical methods for controlling the presence of antimicrobials at cross-contamination levels. Such methods enable stringent control to prevent uncontrolled antimicrobial use in poultry production systems, thereby mitigating the development of antimicrobial resistance.

References

REFERENCES

(1) Butovskaya, E.; Carrillo Heredero, A. M.; Segato, G.; Faggionato, E.; Borgia, M.; Marchis, D.; Bertini, S. Quantitative Determination of Tetracyclines in Medicated Feed for Food-Producing Animals by HPLC–DAD. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2024, 41 (6), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2024.2341115

(2) EFSA. Maximum Levels of Cross-Contamination for 24 Antimicrobial Active Substances in Non-Target Feed. Part 1: Methodology, General Data Gaps and Uncertainties. EFSA Journal 2021, 19 (2), 6852. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6852

(3) Stolker, A. A. M.; Manti, V.; Zuidema, T.; van Egmond, H.; Deckers, E. R.; Herbes, R.; Hooglugt, J.; Olde Heuvel, E.; de Jong, J. Carry-Over of Veterinary Drugs from Medicated to Non-Medicated Feeds in Commercial Feed Manufacturing Plants. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2013, 30 (6), 1100–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2013.794308

(4) Pereira Lopes, R.; de Freitas Passos, É.; de Alkimim Filho, J. F.; Vargas Azevedo, E.; Vasconcellos Augusti, D.; Augusti, R. Development and Validation of a Method for the Determination of Sulfonamides in Animal Feed by Modified QuEChERS and LC-MS/MS Analysis. Food Control 2012, 28, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.026

(5) Diarra, M. S.; Silversides, F. G.; Diarrassouba, F.; Pritchard, J.; Masson, L.; Brousseau, R.; Bonnet, C.; Delaquis, P.; Bach, S.; Skura, B. J.; Topp, E. Impact of Feed Supplementation with Antimicrobial Agents on Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus Counts, and Antibiotic Resistance Phenotypes and Distribution of Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants in Escherichia coli Isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73 (22), 7519–7526. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01086-07

(6) Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting on Carryover in Feed and Transfer from Feed to Food of Unavoidable and Unintended Residues of Approved Veterinary Drugs; FAO Headquarters: Rome, Italy, 8–10 January 2019. Available from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/767207b5-13ad-4089-9295-6d5c5ead622c/content (accessed 2024-12-13)

(7) European Council (EC). Regulation (EU) 2019/4 of December 11, 2018, on the Manufacture, Placing on the Market and Use of Medicated Feed. Off. J. Eur. Union 2019, L 4, 7.01.2019. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R0004 (accessed 2024-6-07)

(8) European Commission. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1229 of 20 February 2024 Supplementing Regulation (EU) 2019/4 of the European Parliament and of the Council by Establishing Specific Maximum Levels of Cross-Contamination of Antimicrobial Active Substances in Non-Target Feed and Methods of Analysis for These Substances in Feed. Off. J. Eur. Union 2024, L 206, 1–15. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202401229 (accessed 2025-3-24)

(9) Patyra, E.; Nebot, C.; Gavilán, R. E.; Cepeda, A.; Kwiatek, K. Development and Validation of an LC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Tiamulin, Trimethoprim, Tylosin, Sulfadiazine, and Sulfamethazine in Medicated Feed. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2018, 35 (5), 882–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2018.1426887

(10) Vincent, U.; Oliveira Goncalves, C.; Ferrari, L.; Bouten, K.; Chedin, M.; Stroka, J.; Pinotti, L.; Von Holst, C. Determination of 24 Antibiotics at Trace Levels in Animal Feed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography – Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), Validation Report; JRC Technical Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2024. https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/12878

(11) Przeniosło-Siwczyńska, M.; Patyra, E.; Chyłek-Purchała, M.; Kozak, B.; Kwiatek, K. Occurrence of Tetracyclines in Feedingstuffs – Results of a Two-Year Study within the Official Control of Feed. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2015, 59, 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1515/bvip-2015-0079

(12) Wegh, R. S.; Berendsen, B. J. A.; Driessen-Van Lankveld, W. D. M.; Pikkemaat, M. G.; Zuidema, T.; Van Ginkel, L. A. Non-Targeted Workflow for Identification of Antimicrobial Compounds in Animal Feed Using Bioassay-Directed Screening in Combination with Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry. J. Food Prot. 2017, 80 (8), 1334–1342. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1364431

(13) Gbylik, M.; Posyniak, A.; Gajda, A. Simultaneous Determination of Fluoroquinolones in Feed by Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 2012, 56, 343–347.

(14) Patyra, E.; Przeniosło-Siwczyńska, M.; Kwiatek, K. Determination of Tetracyclines in Animal Feeds Using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Molecules 2019, 24, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24030452

(15) Patyra, E.; Kwiatek, K. Comparison of HPLC–DAD and LC–MS Techniques for the Determination of Tetracyclines in Medicated Feeds Using One Extraction Protocol. Chromatographia 2021, 84, 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-021-04058-3

(16) Gavilán, R. E.; Nebot, C.; Patyra, E.; Vazquez, B.; Miranda, J. M.; Cepeda, A. Determination of Florfenicol, Thiamfenicol, and Chloramfenicol at Trace Levels in Animal Feed by HPLC–MS/MS. Antibiotics 2019, 8 (2), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020059

(17) Przeniosło-Siwczyńska, M.; Patyra, E.; Grelik, A.; Maja Chyłek-Purchała, M.; Kozak, B.; Kwiatek, K. Contamination of Animal Feed with Undeclared Tetracyclines—Confirmatory Analysis by Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry after Microbiological Plate Test. Molecules 2020, 25, 2162. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092162

(18) Przeniosło-Siwczyńska, M.; Grelik, A.; Kwiatek, K. Identification and Quantification of Tylosin in Animal Feed by Liquid Chromatography Combined with Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. J. Vet. Res. 2020, 64, 299–304. https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2020-0031

(19) Kaklamanos, G.; Vincent, U.; von Holst, C. Analysis of Antimicrobial Agents in Pig Feed by Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1293, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2013.03.078

(20) Boix, C.; Ibáñez, M.; Sancho, J.; León, N.; Yusá, V.; Hernández, F. Qualitative Screening of 116 Veterinary Drugs in Feed by Liquid Chromatography–High Resolution Mass Spectrometry: Potential Application to Quantitative Analysis. Food Chem. 2014, 165, 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.086

(21) Miao, X.; Xu, L.; Li, H.; Yang, Z. Determination of Olaquindox, Carbadox, and Cyadox in Animal Feeds by Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2018, 35 (9), 1731–1738. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2018.1461255

(22) Patyra, E.; Kwiatek, K. Simultaneous Determination of Sulfonamides, Trimethoprim, Amoxicillin, and Tylosin in Medicated Feed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry. J. Vet. Res. 2024 68, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0011

(23) Patyra, E.; Nebot, C.; Gavilán, R. E.; Cepeda, A.; Kwiatek, K. Development and Validation of Multi-Residue and Multi-Class Method for Antibacterial Substances Analysis in Non-Target Feed by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2018, 35 (3), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1414961

(24) Avolio, R.; Pederiva, S.; Morello, S.; Crescio, M. I.; Ru, G.; Grifoni, F.; Abete, M. C.; Marchis, D. Official Controls on Carry-Over of Antibiotics in Feed: A Useful Tool to Contain the Development of Antibiotic Resistance. Anim. Husb. Dairy Vet. Sci. 2021, 5, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.15761/AHDVS.1000185

(25) Varenina, I.; Bilandžić, N.; Kos, B.; Varga, I.; Sedak, M.; Solomun Kolanović, B.; Čalopek, B.; Đokić, M. Antibiotic Residues in Non-Targeted Animal Feed – Development of a Sensitive LC-MS/MS Methodology. Vet. Stanica 2025, 56(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.46419/vs.56.2.10

(26) European Commission. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/808 of 22 March 2021 on the Performance of Analytical Methods for Residues of Pharmacologically Active Substances Used in Food-Producing Animals and on the Interpretation of Results as Well as on the Methods to Be Used for Sampling and Repealing Decisions 2002/657/EC and 98/179/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union 2021, L 180, 21.05.2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R0808 (accessed 2025-02-24)

(27) Edison, S. L. R.; Williams, A., Eds. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4: Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 3rd ed.; EURACHEM/CITAC: 2012. https://www.eurachem.org/images/stories/Guides/pdf/QUAM2012_P1.pdf (accessed 2025-02-14)

(28) Matuszewski, B. K.; Constanzer, M. L.; Chavez-Eng, C. M. Strategies for the Assessment of Matrix Effect in Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Based on HPLC−MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75 (13), 3019–3030. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac020361s

(29) Valese, A. C.; Molognoni, L.; Coelho de Souza, N.; Plôencio, L. A. de S.; Oliveira Costa, A. C.; Barreto, F.; Daguer, H. Development, Validation and Different Approaches for the Measurement Uncertainty of a Multi-Class Veterinary Drugs Residues LC–MS Method for Feeds. J. Chromatogr. B 2017, 1064, 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.03.026

(30) Gaugain, M.; Raynaud, A.; Bourcier, S.; Verdon, E.; Hurtaud-Pessel, D. Development of a Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method to Determine Colistin, Bacitracin, and Virginiamycin M1 at Cross-Contamination Levels in Animal Feed. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2021, 38 (9), 1481–1494.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2021.1922760

(31) Civitareale, C.; Mestria, S.; Gallo, P.; Giannetti, L.; Neri, B.; Stacchini, P.; Fiori, M. Multi-Drug Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method to Quantify Antimicrobials in Feeding Stuffs at Carry-Over Level. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2018 32 (14), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8216

(32) Waters. Rapid, Simple and Effective Clean-up of Bovine Liver Samples Prior to UPLC-MS/MS Multiresidue Veterinary Drugs Analysis. Waters Application Note 72000588 EN AG-PDF, March 2017.

https://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/720005887en.pdf (accessed 2025-02-17)

(33) Borràs, S.; Companyó, R.; Guiteras, J.; Bosch, J.; Medina, M.; Termes, S. Multiclass Method for Antimicrobial Analysis in Animal Feeds by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405(27), 8817–8827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-7268-4

(34) Dias, N. C.; Poole, C. F. Mechanistic Study of the Sorption Properties of OASIS® HLB and its Use in Solid-Phase Extraction. Chromatographia 2022, 56, 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02491931

(35) Gaugain, M.; Fourmond, M.-P.; Fuselier, R.; Verdon, E.; Roudaut, B.; Pessel, D. Control of Antimicrobials in Feed Using Liquid Chromatography−Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Assessment of Cross-Contamination Rates at the Farm Level. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68 (34), 9033-9042. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02999

(36) Berendsen, B. J. A.; Elbers, I. J. W.; Stolker, A. A. M. Determination of the Stability of Antibiotics in Matrix and Reference Solutions Using a Straightforward Procedure Applying Mass Spectrometric Detection. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2011, 28(12), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2011.604045

(37) Lehotay, S. J.; Le Floch, M.; Lightfield, A. R.; Couëdor, P.; Hurtaud-Pessel, D.; Michlig, N.; Verdon, E. Stability Study of Selected Veterinary Drug Residues Spiked into Extracts from Different Food Commodities. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2023, 40 (9), 1198-1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2023.2240444

(38) Mitchell, S. M.; Ullman, J. L.; Teel, A. L.; Watts, R. J. pH and Temperature Effects on the Hydrolysis of Three β-lactam Antibiotics: Ampicillin, Cefalotin and Cefoxitin. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 466–467, 547–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.027

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-12-22 — Updated on 2025-12-24

Versions

How to Cite

Dimitrieska Stojkovikj, E., Koceva, D., Angjeleska, A., Stojković, G. ., Stojanovska Dimzoska, B., & Hajrulai-Musliu, Z. (2025). Multi-class analysis of antimicrobial substances in poultry feed at cross-contamination levels by UHPLC-MS/MS – Method establishment, validation, and application: UHPLC-MS/MS analysis of antimicrobials in feed. Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 44(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.20450/mjcce.2025.3166 (Original work published December 22, 2025)

Issue

Section

Analytical Chemistry

Most read articles by the same author(s)